Friday, July 31, 2009
Ares V
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Ares I
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Orion Spacecraft
Orion Spacecraft
Constellation Program
As part of the Constellation program, NASA plans to develop spacecraft and booster vehicles to replace the Space Shuttle and send astronauts to the Moon and possibly to Mars as well. Currently, NASA is in the process of designing two boosters, the Ares I and Ares V. Ares I will have the sole function of launching mission crews into orbit. Ares V will be designed to launch other hardware for use on missions and will have a heavier lift capacity than the Ares I booster. In addition to these two boosters, NASA is designing a set of other spacecraft for use during Constellation. These will include the Orion crew capsule, the Earth Departure Stage and the Altair lunar lander. Concerned by price increases on the program, U.S. President Obama has ordered a review of the project that will report by August 2009.
A full-scale mockup of NASA's Orion crew module is being tested in water under simulated and real landing weather conditions. Beginning March 23, a Navy-built, 18,000-pound Orion mockup will be placed in a test pool at the Naval Surface Warfare Center's Carderock Division in West Bethesda, Md. Ocean testing will begin April 6 off the coast of NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
The goal of the operation, dubbed the Post-landing Orion Recovery Test, or PORT, is to determine what kind of motions the astronaut crew can expect after landing, as well as conditions outside for the recovery team. The experience will help NASA design landing recovery operations including equipment, ship and crew necessities.
The Carderock facility provides a controlled environment for crew recovery personnel to familiarize themselves with the Orion capsule before the team tests procedures in the uncontrolled waters of the Atlantic Ocean.
For the ocean testing, the team will use a space shuttle solid rocket booster recovery ship to take the mockup out to sea, going further into rougher conditions each day. A media opportunity to view testing visible from shore will be scheduled for April 7 at Kennedy.
During the Orion mockup's transportation from Maryland to Florida, it will make stops for public viewing. Designated opportunities are March 30 in front of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington and April 3 at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor's Complex in Florida.
NASA's Constellation Program, which includes the Orion crew vehicle and the Ares I rocket that will launch it, is America's next-generation human spaceflight system that will carry astronauts to the International Space Station, back to the moon and to destinations beyond.
The Constellation Program's Operations and Test Integration Office at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston is leading the PORT effort. Development of Orion and associated Constellation Program elements is a joint effort involving every NASA center and partners across the country. Results of these tests will influence Orion vehicle design at Johnson and recovery hardware designs under evaluation at Kennedy.
NASA`s Constellation Program
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
New Fuel Source
"Waste is just too gross of a term for it," says Sherrell Greene, director of Nuclear Technology at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. "I'm trying to get to the 90% of the fuel in that rod."
It's a difficult thing to do, but these days there's much more incentive to try. This spring the Obama administration effectively ended the long-tortured idea of storing the nation's spent nuclear fuel deep under Yucca Mountain in south-central Nevada. At the same time, the nation seems to be inching toward adding new nuclear reactors, creating more waste that we don't know what to do with. (When Yucca Mountain was conceived, it was assumed that the nuclear reactors in the United States would be shut down as they aged and not replaced.)
There is already a method used by countries like France and Japan to reprocess spent nuclear fuel. It has a long list of nasty problems associated with it, however. It's very expensive--the cost of uranium would have to jump by a factor of six to match the price of reprocessed fuel. Though reprocessing nuclear fuel shrinks the amount of waste, it doesn't eliminate it. And, worst of all, it results in the creation of plutonium, which could be used to make nuclear weapons.
For all of these reasons, the U.S., which invented the process as part of its nuclear weapons program in the 1940s and 1950s then pushed it as a recycling method up until the early 1970s, never built a reprocessing plant and has strongly discouraged other nations from doing so.
But the politics of reprocessing have been heating up. Pro-nuclear energy Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., pushed Energy Secretary Steven Chu on the issue in the spring. McCain and others suggest one big reason new nuclear reactors are not being built is the uncertainty around where the spent fuel is going to go.
In June, the House Science and Technology Committee held a hearing asking experts for suggestions about how reprocessing should be approached. Mark Peters, of Argonne National Laboratory, said that because the U.S. never invested in a big, current-generation reprocessing plant, the country has the opportunity to instead design and build a safer system.
The hope is that researchers can develop a method that extracts the usable portion of the spent fuel without isolating the plutonium. Left behind would be very poisonous nuclear waste, but waste that would degrade in tens of years instead of tens of thousands of years, making the need for very long-term storage less acute.
(When nuclear waste includes extremely radioactive elements, it is said to be "self-protecting"--the gamma rays that it emits would cook a person so fast that it's all but impossible to do something nefarious with it. Plutonium on its own, while very dangerous if inhaled, emits comparatively weak alpha radiation, which can be easily shielded.)
At Oak Ridge, Greene's team last year demonstrated a method by which it removed the uranium and the plutonium together. The team processed just 45 pounds of material, and Greene admits that they are far from proving it can be done on an industrial scale. "But it is now an established fact that we know a new set of processes to produce a new fuel without having to produce plutonium," he says. "It may very well be that it doesn't end up being the best method, but if there is one set of processes to do it, there are others. I'm confident we can find a way to do this."
Argonne National Laboratory has developed a method called pyroprocessing that uses molten salt to separate the materials instead of a water-based approach, like the methods used abroad and at Oak Ridge. Some so-called Generation IV nuclear reactors being researched eliminate the need for reprocessing or include pyroprocessing. And some suggest using nuclear fission to help transform nuclear waste into fuel. (See "Reinventing Nuclear Power.")
Many, though, are adamantly opposed to reprocessing. They argue that though some methods, new and old, do reduce the volume of waste, they actually complicate waste disposal by creating different types of radioactive waste. They also remain extraordinarily expensive. And while methods like the one being explored at Oak Ridge do protect the plutonium slightly, it's not nearly enough to eliminate the threat of proliferation.
"It's an oxymoron to talk about proliferation-resistant reprocessing," says Frank von Hippel, a physicist and professor of public and international affairs at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School. "Nobody has a good idea at the moment."
Another critic: John Holdren, Obama's science adviser, who argued against nuclear reprocessing in a 2003 paper.
In the meantime, nuclear waste in the U.S. is being stored at nuclear plants. The spent rods are cooled in pools of water for at least a year and then transferred to thick casks of steel and concrete.
No one seems to think this method is ideal, but both proponents and opponents of reprocessing agree that the method is acceptable for the next few decades. Which may give us time to either come up with better reactors or better reprocessing technologies.
"The vision in this country is that as long as we have nukes, we have an assumption that there will always be nuclear waste so we should learn to deal with it," says Oak Ridge's Greene. "Well, maybe there are other nuclear fuel cycles and reactors and processes that can minimize creation of problem."
(Source: www.forbes.com )
Hypophysis
Monday, July 27, 2009
Fornix (Brain)
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Mammillary Bodies
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Tuber Cinereum
Corpus Callosum
Friday, July 24, 2009
Basilar Sulcus
Cingulate Sulcus
Cingulate Sulcus
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Cingulate Gyrus
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Cerebellum
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Spinal Cord
The spinal cord is 45 cm long in men and 43 cm long in women, is enlarged in the cervical and lumbar regions. The spinal cord white matter envelops the grey matter, which has an H-like appearance. The spinal cord is divided into 31 segments as 31 pairs of spinal nerves (right and left pairs) branch out of each segment. Each nerve has a ventral (anterior), and a dorsal (posterior) root; the latter can be distinguished by the presence of an oval swelling, the spinal ganglion, which contains numerous nerve cells. 6–8 motor nerve rootlets spring from right and left ventro lateral sulci in an orderly manner. Nerve rootlets get together to form nerve roots. Likewise sensory nerve rootlets form off right and left dorsal lateral sulci and form sensory nerve roots. The ventral (motor) and dorsal (sensory) roots combine to form spinal nerves(mixed; motor and sensory), one on each side of the spinal cord.
The spinal cord is divided into cervical, thoracic, lumbar and sacral regions, corresponding with the attachments of the different groups of nerves. There are 8 pairs of cervical spinal nerves, 12 thoracic, 5 lumbar, 5 sacral, 1 coccygeal.
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Somatosensory System
The processing center of the somatosensory system is situated just posterior to the central sulcus in the lateral postcentral gyrus of the parietal lobe of the cerebral cortex. The somatosensory system is involved in processing tactile information (sense of touch) and it receives the somatic sensory data from the ventrobasal nucleus of the thalamus.